Stretch wrote:Sorry Dougie, are you saying it doesn't do that at all, or that it now does it automatically with V92?
With V90/V92 the way the PM3 handles intervals has changed. There is no option to make it work the way V88 and below worked.
Stretch wrote:Sorry Dougie, are you saying it doesn't do that at all, or that it now does it automatically with V92?

Andrew Jones wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Sir Pirate wrote:Andrew Jones wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Very constructive, thanks for that.
Sir P

Citroen wrote:Stretch wrote:Sorry Dougie, are you saying it doesn't do that at all, or that it now does it automatically with V92?
With V90/92 he way the PM3 handles intervals has changed. There is no option to make it work the way V88 and below worked.

Sir Pirate wrote:Daren wrote:It's fair enough, particularly when we already accept the myriad of other variables that mean all competitors are not playing on a level field.
Well then, would it not seem a sensible option to eliminate any “non fairness” if we have the ability to do so? rather than adding to them.
Sir P
Daren wrote:Besides, if a PM3 gives a short person a little advantage compared to a tall person using a PM2, that actually goes a very small way to levelling the playing field between those two people.
Matt Newman on Friday wrote:I don't persoanlly get a **** about whether there is a level playing field or not ... its the confusion / endless debate about whether there is a level playing field or not that is one of the main things I'm keen to avoid.
Sir Pirate wrote:The point is this. The challenge is different depending on what PM monitor you have. Nobody can dismiss that as a fact.
Sir P
Sir Pirate wrote:Yet again you miss the point. Pete I am surprised at you.![]()